Fourth Circuit Defies Bruen by Upholding Registration Scheme

September 4, 2024

In a blatant defiance of the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, the Fourth Circuit Court has upheld Maryland’s Handgun Qualification License (HQL) law, which requires citizens to obtain a permit simply to purchase a firearm.

This ruling, handed down by a more liberal-leaning court, goes far beyond the original scope of Bruen, which struck down laws requiring permits to carry handguns, and instead imposes a government-controlled registry of every gun and gun owner in the state.

The Bruen decision, authored by Justice Clarence Thomas in 2022, was a monumental victory for gun rights advocates, establishing that any law restricting gun ownership must align with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.

The ruling struck down “may-issue” laws, which required individuals to prove a specific need to carry a handgun in public, affirming that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry firearms without excessive government interference.

However, Maryland’s HQL law takes this a step further by requiring law-abiding citizens to jump through numerous bureaucratic hoops—four hours of training, live-fire testing, fingerprinting, and a waiting period—just to purchase a handgun. In essence, this law functions as a de facto registry, tracking every gun owner and their firearms through state control, an undeniable infringement on the Second Amendment.

The Fourth Circuit’s ruling is not only a defiance of Bruen, but it also sets a dangerous precedent. By allowing states to require permits simply to purchase a firearm, it opens the door for widespread gun registries—an outcome that is not only unconstitutional but also unthinkable to the Founding Fathers, who fought against government overreach.

“The Fourth Circuit is clearly disregarding the Bruen decision and the Second Amendment,” said Texas Gun Rights President Chris McNutt. “This permit-to-purchase law serves as nothing more than a state-controlled gun registry, and it’s an affront to the freedoms our Founding Fathers intended for us. Texas Gun Rights will continue to fight these rulings and ensure that the rights of gun owners are fully restored.”

Maryland’s HQL law is a prime example of how the left continues to undermine Bruen and chip away at the Second Amendment. For anti-gun politicians, permit systems like this are a dream—allowing them to collect data on every gun and gun owner, while imposing lengthy delays and barriers that could discourage law-abiding citizens from exercising their constitutional rights.

The Fourth Circuit’s decision is a reminder that the fight for gun rights is far from over. With liberal courts determined to undo the progress made by Bruen, gun rights organizations like Texas Gun Rights are more important than ever in defending the freedoms guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

Support Texas Gun Rights as we continue to fight for your freedoms and ensure the Second Amendment is restored to its full strength.

ATF Official’s Glock Disassembly Fail Sparks Controversy and Mockery

March 11, 2024 

In a recent CBS “Face the Nation” segment that’s now making rounds across social media for all the wrong reasons, ATF’s Firearms Ammunition Technology Division acting chief, Chris Bort, found himself under fire. Billed as a “firearms expert,” Bort’s struggle with a task as basic as disassembling a Glock pistol—a procedure often regarded as straightforward within gun enthusiast circles—has ignited a flurry of criticism and ridicule.

The Glock, known for its widespread use and simple maintenance, has been a staple in the firearms community for its ease of disassembly. This routine process, achievable by individuals with minimal instruction, seemed to puzzle Bort, an official whose role significantly impacts the enforcement of Second Amendment rights in the United States. The episode has raised eyebrows and questions about the competency of those tasked with regulating firearms.

This incident caught the attention of popular YouTuber Garand Thumb, a well-known figure in the Second Amendment community for his engaging and informative firearms content. A former Air Force member, Garand Thumb, took a break from his regular postings to highlight Bort’s gaffe, further amplifying the criticism and adding a layer of embarrassment to the ATF official’s televised misstep.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Garand Thumb (@garand_thumb)

The episode adds to the ongoing narrative questioning the expertise of individuals in significant positions of authority over gun laws and regulations.

Similar instances, such as Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s misinterpretation of a bump stock’s function, fuel concerns over the knowledge base of those shaping firearms policy. Such misconceptions, particularly when voiced by individuals with the power to influence gun laws, underscore a worrying disconnect between regulators and the technical realities of firearms.

Critics argue that this lack of basic firearms knowledge among key figures could undermine the credibility of institutions like the ATF, tasked with enforcing gun laws. The call for more educated and proficient authorities in matters concerning firearms rights and safety is growing louder, particularly among gun owners and Second Amendment advocates.

The incident not only serves as a moment of embarrassment for the ATF but also as a stark reminder of the importance of firearms education among those in positions to regulate and influence gun policy. As debates over gun control intensify, the competency and expertise of those at the helm of regulation become increasingly crucial.

For many within the pro-gun community, this episode is a vivid illustration of the challenges facing effective firearms regulation and enforcement. It underscores the need for a better-informed approach to gun policy, one that respects the technical nuances of firearms and the rights of law-abiding citizens under the Second Amendment.

Sign our petition instructing your congressman to ABOLISH the ATF.