In a controversial ruling that has raised alarms among Second Amendment advocates, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the federal lifetime prohibition on firearm possession for individuals convicted of nonviolent felonies. The decision came despite the Supreme Court’s 2022 landmark Bruen ruling, which emphasized the importance of historical tradition when determining the constitutionality of firearm regulations.

The case centered on Melynda Vincent, who was convicted of federal bank fraud in 2008 for writing a fraudulent check totaling just $498.12. Despite the minor nature of her offense and her subsequent rehabilitation—including earning multiple degrees and operating a social work practice—the court ruled that she remains barred for life from firearm ownership.

In its decision, the Tenth Circuit leaned on its prior precedent, U.S. v. McCane (2009), stating that Bruen did not “indisputably and pellucidly” overturn this earlier ruling. This effectively sidestepped a thorough analysis under Bruen’s historical tradition framework, sparking criticism that the court ignored a vital constitutional principle.

Texas Lawmaker Fights Back with HB 2759

Meanwhile, in Texas, State Representative Wes Virdell (R) has taken a proactive step to clarify and strengthen firearm rights for Texans with the filing of House Bill 2759. The bill aims to narrow the scope of firearm possession restrictions by focusing on convictions related only to serious and violent felonies.

Under HB 2759:

• Only individuals convicted of specific, violent felonies (like robbery, arson, burglary, and offenses against persons or children) would face restrictions on firearm possession.
• Even for these individuals, firearm possession would only be restricted until five years after their release from confinement or supervision.
• After the five-year mark, individuals would be permitted to possess firearms within their residence premises.

This approach aims to distinguish between nonviolent and violent offenders, ensuring that Texans aren’t unfairly stripped of their Second Amendment rights for nonviolent infractions like minor financial crimes.

A Pro-Gun Legislative Push in Texas

“It’s about restoring rights to Texans who have served their time and turned their lives around,” said Virdell. “If someone has proven themselves as a responsible, law-abiding citizen, they should not be permanently banned from exercising their constitutional rights.”

Virdell’s legislation comes as part of a broader push among pro-gun lawmakers to counter federal overreach and ensure Texans’ Second Amendment rights are protected from outdated or unjust prohibitions.

A Battle Between State and Federal Powers

HB 2759’s introduction adds a compelling dimension to the ongoing national debate over firearm rights, especially as courts like the Tenth Circuit continue to uphold federal restrictions that conflict with the Supreme Court’s Bruen standard.

For many, this is a fight over fundamental freedoms. While the Tenth Circuit ruling may stand for now, lawmakers like Rep. Virdell are stepping up to ensure that Texas remains a bulwark for gun rights in the face of federal restrictions.

As the bill progresses, gun rights advocates will be watching closely to see whether Texas will lead the charge in restoring constitutional rights to nonviolent offenders who have paid their dues to society.

Click here to sign your petition to AG Pam Bondi and Acting ATF Director Kash Patel to return ALL confiscated Forced Reset Triggers right away.